https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933412
--- Comment #6 from Antonio T. sagitter <[email protected]> --- > Please open a ticket with upstream asking for s390x support, too. Supported architectures are explicitly listed by Upstream: https://github.com/google/cpu_features#support > Is there a particular reason not to name this simply "cpu_features" without > the google- prefix? There are other google-* package (like google-bechmark) in Fedora, and they come from the same Google Open Source repositories; it's a correct way to name this package in my opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
