https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992879
Ben Beasley <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #8 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- > The text at the top of http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/packages.html says that > all packages on that page are covered by GPLv2+. Aha! I missed that. That seems adequate, although a statement in the source is always clearer. Thanks for adding the comment. ----- I’ve never used Pari-GP before, but it seems like you can run the included test to validate the tables something like this: > BuildRequires: pari-gp > %check > cp -p check do-check > cat >> do-check <<'EOF' > all() > quit > EOF > gp --default parisizemax=400M do-check However, it took me about two hours to run that on an ARM-based laptop, so it’s probably not worth it in the end, especially as there isn’t any processing done on the sources during the build. ----- I’m happy to go ahead and finish up the review, but it seems like the spec and SRPM links are now 404. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
