https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992879

Jerry James <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. |
                   |com)                        |



--- Comment #9 from Jerry James <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #8)
> I’ve never used Pari-GP before, but it seems like you can run the included
> test to validate the tables something like this:
> 
> > BuildRequires:  pari-gp
> 
> > %check
> > cp -p check do-check
> > cat >> do-check <<'EOF'
> > all()
> > quit
> > EOF
> > gp --default parisizemax=400M do-check
> 
> However, it took me about two hours to run that on an ARM-based laptop, so
> it’s probably not worth it in the end, especially as there isn’t any
> processing done on the sources during the build.

Yeah, I think I'd prefer to not do that. :-)

> I’m happy to go ahead and finish up the review, but it seems like the spec
> and SRPM links are now 404.

Are you looking at the URLs in comment 3, or the ones at the top of the bug?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to