https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160
Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- >- "ASL 2.0 with exceptions" is not a valid license identifier, as you can see > by its absence from the official list: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses > > There was a thread about this license last year on fedora-legal-list. The > final advice is that "ASL 2.0 with the LLVM exception" is equal to "ASL 2.0" > for Fedora purposes. Therefore, the License field should be "ASL 2.0 or > MIT". > > See Richard Fontana's messages in this thread: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/4OT2CHT3UX7AYI7LDK4YFZEU3QIDZKPY/ TIL. I opened a ticket with rust2rpm: https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/rust2rpm/issue/163 >- I would argue that CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md and ORG_CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md are not > useful documentation for a Fedora package. I agree. The automatic %doc detection quite rigorous, and includes lots of stuff we don't need. In fact, those files are *already* part of -devel files in any case, so adding them in %doc too is redundant: https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/rust2rpm/issue/164 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
