https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160
--- Comment #8 from Olivier Lemasle <[email protected]> --- Thanks for the reviews Jerry, and thanks Fabio for the comments. - Regarding the license, you may have seen that I actually asked for clarification in the fedora-legal thread you mentioned. Actually, I remember I used "ASL 2.0 with exceptions" on other packages I maintain, after Neal Gompa's message telling "ASL 2.0 with exceptions" is sufficient and should "probably" be added to the list of valid licenses. However, I did not see the last replies on the thread at the time, so I've changed to simply "ASL 2.0 or MIT". - I've also remove the codes of conduct, as they're indeed not documentation for the package. Package updated: Spec URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-linux-raw-sys.spec SRPM URL: https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-linux-raw-sys-0.0.28-1.fc35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
