https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036468



--- Comment #27 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #25)
> I'd probably go with 1.0.1. EPEL8 can wait a little.(In reply to Neal Gompa
> from comment #20)
> > For EPEL7, you'd BR "devtoolset-10-toolchain" and put ".
> > /opt/rh/devtoolset-10/enable" at the beginning of %build (and %install and
> > %check as needed).
> > 
> > For EPEL8, you'd BR "gcc-toolset-10-toolchain" and put ".
> > /opt/rh/gcc-toolset-10/enable" instead.
> 
> That's very useful advice. Is it documented in EPEL docs? I couldn't find it.

This is not documented anywhere, as far as I know. Someone should document it
for EPEL packaging guidelines. :)

(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #26)
> (In reply to Christoph Erhardt from comment #24)
> [...]
> > How should we deal with this situation?
> > a) Move forward to a Git snapshot.
> > b) Stay with 1.0.1 for now, accepting that mold won't be available on epel8
> > x86_64 until 1.0.2.
> > c) Invest effort into backporting the fix - Debian/RHEL-style, as it were.
> 
> I'd go with b) . EPEL8 can wait a little while in my opinion, unless you have
> some users that are waiting for EPEL8 build right now.

I'd recommend just doing Fedora and EPEL 9 for now as well, unless you have a
*really* compelling reason to do EPEL 8 immediately.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036468
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to