https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040118
--- Comment #18 from Garry T. Williams <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Artur Frenszek-Iwicki from comment #17) > > License: GPLv2+ and GPL+ and BSD > This should be accompanied by a comment explaining which parts are subject > to which licences. Fixed. > > for f in %{build_docs}/html/ex/*.txt; do \ > The docs directory is empty at this point, resulting in > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ex/ > containing only a single, broken symlink named "*.tcl", pointing to > "../../doc/deal/html/ex/*.txt". > > I guess in this case it makes sense to copy stuff to %{_docdir}/%{name} > manually (as you did before), > rather than relying on the %doc magic. Yikes! I didn't notice that. (I even installed the updated RPM and tested. But I never tested any of the ex/* libraries.) Would %post be appropriate to add symlinks after the doc files are installed? If not, I'll add the explicit copy command back and delete the %doc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040118 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
