https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040118



--- Comment #20 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <[email protected]> ---
Looks good, though there's one bit that I'm still thinking about. The packaging
guidelines say:
> Files located in %_pkgdocdir must not affect the runtime of the packaged 
> software.
> The software must function properly and with unchanged functionality if those 
> files are modified, removed or not installed at all.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

The files in %{_datadir}/%{name}/ex/ are symlinks to files in
%{_pkgdocdir}/html/ex/,
which violates this rule - if the files in %{_pkgdocdir} are deleted, the
symlinks
will become broken (dangling). I suppose we could comply with the guidelines by
flipping
the files, i.e. making those in %{_pkgdocdir} symlinks to those in
%{_datadir}/%{name}:
> for f in %{build_docs}/html/ex/*.txt; do \
>     ( \
>         DESTINATION="%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/ex/$(basename "${f}" .txt).tcl"; 
> \
>         mv "$f" "$DESTINATION"; \
>         ln -sr "$DESTINATION" "$f"; \
>     ) \
> done


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040118
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to