https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077088
--- Comment #1 from Breno <[email protected]> --- I know it's not super of a big deal, but there are diffs between the spec file inside the SRPM and the one in the URL. See below. Also, we need a LICENSE file. Other than that will be fine. --- spec/rubygem-scanf.spec 2022-04-20 12:54:53.000000000 -0400 +++ srpm/rubygem-scanf.spec 2022-04-20 12:52:12.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.2.5) +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: + release_number = 1; + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{?dist} +## END: Set by rpmautospec + %global gem_name scanf Name: rubygem-%{gem_name} @@ -57,4 +66,5 @@ %changelog -%autochangelog +* Wed Apr 20 2022 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden <[email protected]> 1.0.0-1 +- Initial package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077088 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
