https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077088
--- Comment #2 from Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Breno from comment #1) > I know it's not super of a big deal, but there are diffs between the spec > file inside the SRPM and the one in the URL. See below. I believe that is the result of the %autorelease and %autochangelog macros. Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpmautospec I believe this is the recommended approach. > Also, we need a LICENSE file. Should I for now copy the LICENSE file from upstream and open an issue/PR to include it in a future release? Perhaps that's also a place to ask about the test files and README. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077088 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
