https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136778
Sandro <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Flags| |needinfo?([email protected] | |om) --- Comment #6 from Sandro <[email protected]> --- I'm not sure if this applies here, but reading Miro's comment for his Root License Directory patch [1] seems to suggest, that you still need to use %license in the spec file: %pyproject_save_files: Support License-Files installed into the *Root License Directory* from PEP 369 Files still need to be marked as License-File to be considered %license, but if their path in METADATA is specified relative to dist-info/licenses, they are correctly recognised. This makes License-Files specified by hatchling 1.9.0+ marked as %license. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/c/92ad52e5d4b941ebc70de84dbd53569dc5ea32b7?branch=rawhide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136778 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
