https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130903



--- Comment #9 from Benson Muite <[email protected]> ---
> Do you mean to put `ExcludeArch: ELN` into spec literally?
Yes, along with a comment that it is excluded because of GTest.

> Aren't snapshots allowed? It's not a problem for me to provide this change as 
> a patch,
> but it is already merged into upstream.
That is ok. Snapshots are fine, however checksums of the downloaded source, and
packaged source did not match when running Fedora Review. Output I got 
(which for some reason still has GTest) was:
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/google/googletest/archive/5e6a533680fc8292c31f31664d80c48440d4a526/googletest-5e6a533680fc8292c31f31664d80c48440d4a526.tar.gz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : ERROR
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
bf5fa6ff9d9d5094d3967f93a08fe9558866605be6bb7e810b2052b2a01fd3ec
https://github.com/AngusJohnson/Clipper2/archive/Clipper2_1.0.6/Clipper2-Clipper2_1.0.6.tar.gz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : ERROR
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
f6dcff8ab6edc241cbd7d8feaea5e6f3d1acd127208f754d3decc20ee27d1078


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2130903
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to