https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643

Jan Drögehoff <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(sentrycraft123@gm |
                   |ail.com)                    |



--- Comment #20 from Jan Drögehoff <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Alessio from comment #19)
> Thank you @[email protected] 
> 
> New spec and srpm
> 
> Spec URL: https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/lite-xl/lite-xl.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/lite-xl/lite-xl-2.1.0-1.fc37.src.rpm

Haven't ran this this through fedora-review but I have one improvement to
suggestion and one question:

- lua, freetype2, pcre2 and sdl2 dependencies should be expressed using
Pkgconfig Build Dependencies since that is what meson consumes. [1]
- is the `--buildtype=release` intentional? %meson already sets all required
flags and sets the buildtype to plain so that meson does not attempt to
override any of them. [2]


[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/PkgConfigBuildRequires/
[2] https://mesonbuild.com/Quick-guide.html#using-meson-as-a-distro-packager


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to