https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643
--- Comment #27 from Alessio <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jakub Kadlčík from comment #26) > > [ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown > > must be documented in the spec. > > In this case, the licensing is self-explanatory, but can you please > document it anyway, so we comply with the guidelines? > Yes. Something like # The entire source is MIT, except: # fonts/FiraSans-Regular.ttf and fonts/JetBrainsMono-Regular.ttf # that are SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1 > > [ ]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. > > Note: Package contains font files > > Can we not install them? > > [jkadlcik@zeratul ~]$ rpm -ql lite-xl |grep ttf > /usr/share/lite-xl/fonts/FiraSans-Regular.ttf > /usr/share/lite-xl/fonts/JetBrainsMono-Regular.ttf > /usr/share/lite-xl/fonts/icons.ttf > > Ideally, we would like to require or recommend them as a dependency. Do you mean a lite-xl subpackage? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
