https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166288
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar <[email protected]> --- > b) Can a comment be added in the spec file on why the source for the tests > need to be packaged? Tests are packaged in order to be able to run them later against the installed library. They will be exhibited in gating tests. I don't think this needs to be specifically documented in the spec file. There is already %description which explains what the package contains and how to use it. > c) Should upstream add a copy of GPL license as well? Upstream think it's a copy-and-paste mistake. Next release will probably change the license to LGPL. <https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/icecast-libigloo/-/issues/6> > d) Thanks for detailed license breakdown. The license field for the main > package only contains LGPL2. Should other licenses be added? License tag always describes a content of the binary RPM package. The main binary package does not include non-LGPL files. Hence it cannot list other licenses. Compare to tests subpackage which contains tests/prng.c file, hence it lists GPL-2.0-only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166288 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
