https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061
--- Comment #7 from Maxwell G <[email protected]> --- > I decided to rename the package to fvs and provide a library subpackage. I'm not a huge fan of this. One Python distribution really should map to one RPM package in most cases. If the project is primarily an application, its package should be named PROJECTNAME. If it's primarily a library, it should be named python3-PROJECTNAME. The python3-PROJECTNAME package may Provide PROJECTNAME if the project is primarily a library but also contains a secondary PROJECTNAME application/CLI. The PROJECTNAME application package may also Provide python3-PROJECTNAME if it contains a secondary PROJECTNAME library (you should use the `%py_provides` macro for this case; see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_provides_and_requirements). The Python Naming Guidelines (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_naming) provide more details. In this case, it seems `python3-FVS` (as a subpackage of an `python-FVS` SRPM) is the correct naming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
