https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061
--- Comment #8 from Sandro <[email protected]> --- Thank you for the feedback. I think it boils down to what the primary purpose of this package is. Honestly, I don't feel confident in deciding that question. IIRC, it has been developed by one of the Bottles developers for a specific need in Bottles. Bottles uses the library. > In this case, it seems `python3-FVS` (as a subpackage of an `python-FVS` > SRPM) is the correct naming. Well, the project name needs to be normalized. So, if we are going with a library package the names should be python-fvs and python3-fvs respectively. I know you have a ton more experience packaging than I do, but I still don't feel confident if this is primarily an app or a library. Looking at the project description - https://pypi.org/project/FVS/ - it appears to provide both: app and library. So, I'm inclined to go with the application naming advice: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_application_naming, in particular: "Consider adding a virtual provide according to Library naming above (e.g. python3-PROJECTNAME), if it would help users find the package." Should I ask for some more advice on the Python list perhaps? I definitely want to avoid having to rename the package later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
