https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189985
--- Comment #3 from blinxen <[email protected]> --- [fedora-review-service-build] I updated the SPEC + SRPM file and uploaded it to same place. > For Rust packages, the License tag of the main package usually reflects the > license of the crate. Could you put this in your list of stuff that you want to add to the Rust Packaging Guidelines :D? > You also shouldn't "simplify" the license that much anymore ... according to > latest guidance from Red Hat legal, these licenses: Thanks for the info! Do you have the relevant documentation at hand? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189985 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
