https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189985
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- (In reply to blinxen from comment #3) > [fedora-review-service-build] > > I updated the SPEC + SRPM file and uploaded it to same place. Thanks, I will take another look. > > For Rust packages, the License tag of the main package usually reflects the > > license of the crate. > > Could you put this in your list of stuff that you want to add to the Rust > Packaging Guidelines :D? Well, this isn't part of the Rust Packaging Guidelines - at least not any more. It was actually there, but was moved to the Legal docs: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_rust_packages > > You also shouldn't "simplify" the license that much anymore ... according > > to latest guidance from Red Hat legal, these licenses: > > Thanks for the info! Do you have the relevant documentation at hand? Basically here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_license_analysis and these sections for when to use SPDX AND and OR: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_combined_disjunctive_and_conjunctive_license_expressions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189985 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
