https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316282
Cristian Le <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On|2316473 | --- Comment #18 from Cristian Le <[email protected]> --- I went through the `Source` folder for each file, although `licensecheck` also helped with the breakdown: - `Source/API/*`, `Source/App/*`, `Source/Lib/**` except the ones below: LicenseRef-BSD-2-Clause-WITH-AdditionRef-AOMPL-1.0 - `Source/API/EbSvtAv1Enc.h`, `Source/App/app_config.c`, `Source/App/app_output_ivf.c`, `Source/App/app_output_ivf.h`, `Source/Lib/ASM_AVX2/mc.h`, `Source/Lib/Codec/coding_loop.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/enc_cdef.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/enc_dec_process.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/full_loop.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/initial_rc_process.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/inter_prediction.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/mode_decision.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/pass2_strategy.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/pd_process.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/pic_analysis_process.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/product_coding_loop.c`, `Source/Lib/Codec/temporal_filtering.c`, `Source/Lib/Globals/enc_handle.c`, `Source/Lib/Globals/enc_settings.c`, `Source/Lib/Globals/metadata_handle.h`: LicenseRef-BSD-3-Clause-Clear-WITH-AdditionRef-AOMPL-1.0 - `Source/Lib/ASM_AVX2/dav1d_x86inc.asm`, `Source/Lib/ASM_SSE2/x86inc.asm`: ISC - `Source/Lib/ASM_AVX2/itx*`, `Source/Lib/ASM_AVX2/mc*.asm`, `Source/Lib/ASM_NEON/*.S`, `Source/Lib/ASM_NEON/itx_lbd_neon.h`: BSD-2-Clause - `Source/Lib/Codec/vector.*`: MIT - `third_party/safestringlib`: MIT - `third_party/fastfeat`: BSD-3-Clause Maybe you can write the comment as main library is a tangled mixture of `LicenseRef-BSD-2-Clause-WITH-AdditionRef-AOMPL-1.0` and `LicenseRef-BSD-3-Clause-Clear-WITH-AdditionRef-AOMPL-1.0` in order to avoid the long breakdown of the latter. The `License` section should therefore be: `LicenseRef-BSD-2-Clause-WITH-AdditionRef-AOMPL-1.0 AND LicenseRef-BSD-3-Clause-Clear-WITH-AdditionRef-AOMPL-1.0 AND ISC AND BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND MIT` (maybe format it with `%{shrink:` to make it human readable) Other than that all looks fine and I will ping Neal after that for second opinion and to see if we can get you sponsored. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316473 [Bug 2316473] Review Request: safestringlib - Routines for safe string operations -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316282 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202316282%23c18 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
