https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344534



--- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> ---
Some problems with associating spec parts with the correct subpackage:

> Requires:       aw-server-rust

and

> # Hopefuly one day it will be a part of aw-server-rust
> # 
> https://github.com/ActivityWatch/activitywatch/issues/92#issuecomment-1583938452
> Provides:       bundled(aw-server-rust)

and all of:

> %post
> %systemd_user_post %{watcher_name}.service
> %preun
> %systemd_user_preun %{watcher_name}.service
> %postun
> %systemd_user_postun_with_restart %{watcher_name}.service

These all need to be associated with the "aw-awatcher" subpackage, otherwise
they won't have any effect.

I wonder if it could make sense to just name the "source" package "aw-awatcher"
instead?
That would let you avoid this kind of issue.

The project also provides a .desktop file, would you like to package that?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344534

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202344534%23c10

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to