https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344534
--- Comment #15 from wojnilowicz <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #14) > (In reply to wojnilowicz from comment #11) > > (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #10) > > > Some problems with associating spec parts with the correct subpackage: > > > > > > > Requires: aw-server-rust > > > > > > and > > > > > > > # Hopefuly one day it will be a part of aw-server-rust > > > > # > > > > https://github.com/ActivityWatch/activitywatch/issues/92#issuecomment-1583938452 > > > > Provides: bundled(aw-server-rust) > > > > > > and all of: > > > > > > > %post > > > > %systemd_user_post %{watcher_name}.service > > > > %preun > > > > %systemd_user_preun %{watcher_name}.service > > > > %postun > > > > %systemd_user_postun_with_restart %{watcher_name}.service > > > > > > These all need to be associated with the "aw-awatcher" subpackage, > > > otherwise > > > they won't have any effect. > > > > Done. > > No, this is not done. You moved the Provides and Requires, not didn't adapt > the scriptlets. > > The scriptlets need to be associated with the correct package name too, just > like %package, %description, and %files: > > """ > %post -n %{watcher_name} > %systemd_user_post %{watcher_name}.service > > %preun -n %{watcher_name} > %systemd_user_preun %{watcher_name}.service > > %postun -n %{watcher_name} > %systemd_user_postun_with_restart %{watcher_name}.service > """ Fixed that one too. I hope it's done now. Thanks for further hints. > > > I wonder if it could make sense to just name the "source" package > > > "aw-awatcher" instead? > > > That would let you avoid this kind of issue. > > > > The project is named awatcher though, and I feel comfortable with that name. > > That would avoid this kind of issue, but wouldn't make me aware of it. > > What do you mean "wouldn't make me aware of it"? The issue could simply not > occur. True and I wouldn't be aware that it might occur. I would be ignorant to this. That's what I meant. > > > The project also provides a .desktop file, would you like to package that? > > > > No. That would be needed if I would target for a bundle with aw-server-rust > > and would get an executable. I'm targeting for a non-executable plugin that > > would be loaded by aw-server-rust. > > Ok, this makes sense. [fedora-review-service-build] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344534 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202344534%23c15 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
