https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2418609

Petr Menšík <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?([email protected]
                   |                            |om)



--- Comment #2 from Petr Menšík <[email protected]> ---
src/dnscap.h includes isc/list.h.

Two files in isc/ directory are licensed under ISC license. If that is used to
build the binary package and it seems so, License: tag has to contain it also.

URL specified by the package does not work. Please set it either to codeberg
source page or https://www.dns-oarc.net/tools/dnscap

Instead, add separate variable for files, which can be reused in url. Although
until we have only single file, using that url base in Source0 could be enough.

%global files https://www.dns-oarc.net/files/%{name}
...
Source0:        %{files}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

I would put empty line after your %changelog entry, even if upstream has chosen
to not include empty lines. rpmdev-bumpspec uses that and people will use in on
Fedora package anyway.

There is no %license marked file, that has to be fixed.

Documentation should mark %doc files. It is not required to install them by
make install. %doc directive will copy them into appropriate documentation
directory for the package, ensures it keeps timestamp of original files.
Instead of adding whole directory, we should add only separate files.
%doc README.md CHANGES CONTRIBUTORS

I would include CONTRIBUTORS only into devel subpackage. I doubt that is needed
by dependencies using it only.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2418609

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202418609%23c2

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to