https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2449216
Nick Clifton <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?([email protected]) | --- Comment #37 from Nick Clifton <[email protected]> --- (In reply to cyphar from comment #21) > So, lld is a hard requirement for all architectures -- GNU ld doesn't like > the hacks you need to do to get symbol versioning working with Rust, so lld > is a requirement. Not that I am objecting to the use of LLD, but what "hacks" are needed for Rust support that GNU ld does not support ? Perhaps there is a way for the binutils linker to support them ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2449216 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202449216%23c37 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
