https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2500956
--- Comment #6 from Cristian Le <[email protected]> --- I will probably end up taking this, but for now just want to point out an example of an issue that the fedora review service does not catch but that the human reviewer should be checking for as part of the "Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines" check mark. The project is using CC0 as a license for the code, but that is not an allowed license for code (allowed for content only) [1]. Please suggest upstream to relicense to something like MIT0/Unlicense which should be the closest thing (no attribution + do everything under the sun) or any other more standard ones. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2500956 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202500956%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
