https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2502852
--- Comment #9 from Steve Traylen <[email protected]> --- Hi Luca, > I've took the existing rpm spec of when it was still maintained and present > in Fedora This is a re-review so we are really starting again. Its as if the package was new ? We can't just bring it back as it was. Other points still stand: * dlrn variables are never set in Fedora as far as I know so does not belong a a fedora spec file. * flake8 is not a dependency anyway so why is it being removed? * The minversion in tox.ini file is not undesirable - why is it being removed ? * sphinx is not installed anyway when the doc tox env is used. Most if not all the other openstack packages and now been adapted away from RDO which no longer exists, when this package was in F43 RDO still existed. Steve. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2502852 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202502852%23c9 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
