https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2483948
Daniel Berrangé <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from Daniel Berrangé <[email protected]> --- The package naming approach feels a bit off. Essentially this is just shipping two applications. The simplified package file list: %files -n python3-cvmutils %{_bindir}/cvm-encrypt-image %files -n cvmutils-reseal %{_bindir}/cvm-reseal Most notably there is no public importable module providing a library API. Thus I think this falls entirely under the "Application naming" guideline: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_application_naming IOW, I don't think we need to be using 'python3-' name prefix in any output package name. I'd say it is probably ok to use 'cvm-encrypt-image' and 'cvm-reseal' as the output package names, ie a 100% match for the single binary each one ships. Is there a need for these two small scripts to be in separate RPMs though ? If not a single output package could be merely called "cvmutils". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2483948 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202483948%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
