https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2521510
--- Comment #1 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated The spec file is generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. A few customizations are noted: - Tests are disabled, with a sensible and adequate justification. - The Summary is correctly and necessarily shortened to fit in 80 characters. - Five files with spurious executable permissions have them removed in %prep. This is sensible. The files don’t have executable permissions in the upstream git repo, so there isn’t anything obvious to suggest upstream. Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(libssh2-sys/openssl-on-win32) >= 0.3.2 with crate(libssh2-sys/openssl-on-win32) < 0.4.0~) needed by rust-ssh2+openssl-on-win32-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch from @commandline Problem 2: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(libssh2-sys/vendored-openssl) >= 0.3.2 with crate(libssh2-sys/vendored-openssl) < 0.4.0~) needed by rust-ssh2+vendored-openssl-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch from @commandline These two feature metapackages don’t install because they depend on libssh2-sys features that aren’t packaged. See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-libssh2-sys/blob/rawhide/f/rust2rpm.toml for the justification: cargo-toml-patch-comments = [ "drop windows-specific dependencies and features", "drop dependency and feature for unused zlib-ng support", "drop feature for vendored OpenSSL sources", ] You therefore need to drop these two features (openssl-on-win32 and vendored-openssl) as well. You can do it with a Cargo.toml patch, using “rust2rpm -p”, similar to what rust-libssh2-sys does, or you can use the “hide” setting in the “[features]” table in rust2rpm.toml. That should work well in this case, but see the rust2rpm.toml man page for some general caveats. This must be fixed one way or another. All subpackages must be installable. - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/cargo/registry/ssh2-0.9.6/LICENSE-APACHE See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_duplicate_files OK: not a serious problem; due to reasonable rust2rpm design decisions ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "MIT License". 28 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/ben/fedora/review/2521510-rust- ssh2/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust- ssh2-devel , rust-ssh2+default-devel , rust-ssh2+openssl-on- win32-devel , rust-ssh2+vendored-openssl-devel [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=149628385 [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. Tests are disabled, with a sensible and adequate justification. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_use_rpmlint [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 6.8 starting (python version = 3.14.7, NVR = mock-6.8-1.fc44), args: /usr/libexec/mock/mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --no-cleanup-after --no-clean --plugin-option=tmpfs:keep_mounted=True --resultdir=/home/ben/fedora/review/2521510-rust-ssh2/results install /home/ben/fedora/review/2521510-rust-ssh2/results/rust-ssh2-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm /home/ben/fedora/review/2521510-rust-ssh2/results/rust-ssh2+openssl-on-win32-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm /home/ben/fedora/review/2521510-rust-ssh2/results/rust-ssh2+default-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm /home/ben/fedora/review/2521510-rust-ssh2/results/rust-ssh2+vendored-openssl-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm Start(bootstrap): init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish(bootstrap): init plugins Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins INFO: Signal handler active Start: run Mock Version: 6.8 INFO: Mock Version: 6.8 Start(bootstrap): chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled package manager cache Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata INFO: Package manager dnf5 detected and used (fallback) Finish(bootstrap): chroot init Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled package manager cache Start: cleaning package manager metadata Finish: cleaning package manager metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin INFO: Package manager dnf5 detected and used (direct choice) Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /builddir/rust-ssh2-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-ssh2+openssl-on-win32-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-ssh2+default-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-ssh2+vendored-openssl-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 5b4a68bbc9504a6db692ff6b1a039999 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --resolv-conf=off --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin '--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007"' '--setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ ' --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 /usr/bin/dnf5 --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 46 install /builddir/rust-ssh2-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-ssh2+openssl-on-win32-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-ssh2+default-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm /builddir/rust-ssh2+vendored-openssl-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm --setopt=deltarpm=False --setopt=allow_vendor_change=yes --allowerasing --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Checking: rust-ssh2-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm rust-ssh2+default-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm rust-ssh2+openssl-on-win32-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm rust-ssh2+vendored-openssl-devel-0.9.6-1.fc46.noarch.rpm rust-ssh2-0.9.6-1.fc46.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpcm10grq0')] checks: 32, packages: 5 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 25 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s Source checksums ---------------- https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/ssh2/0.9.6/download#/ssh2-0.9.6.crate : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : c95eb3c09e378543395a3fa9796f897861862466ee331d59140ade4ea0dcfdfc CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : c95eb3c09e378543395a3fa9796f897861862466ee331d59140ade4ea0dcfdfc Requires -------- rust-ssh2-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(bitflags/default) >= 2.0.0 with crate(bitflags/default) < 3.0.0~) (crate(libc/default) >= 0.2.0 with crate(libc/default) < 0.3.0~) (crate(libssh2-sys/default) >= 0.3.2 with crate(libssh2-sys/default) < 0.4.0~) (crate(parking_lot/default) >= 0.12.0 with crate(parking_lot/default) < 0.13.0~) /usr/bin/bash cargo rust-ssh2+default-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): cargo crate(ssh2) rust-ssh2+openssl-on-win32-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(libssh2-sys/openssl-on-win32) >= 0.3.2 with crate(libssh2-sys/openssl-on-win32) < 0.4.0~) cargo crate(ssh2) rust-ssh2+vendored-openssl-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (crate(libssh2-sys/vendored-openssl) >= 0.3.2 with crate(libssh2-sys/vendored-openssl) < 0.4.0~) cargo crate(ssh2) Provides -------- rust-ssh2-devel: crate(ssh2) purl(pkg:cargo/[email protected]) rust-ssh2-devel rust-ssh2+default-devel: crate(ssh2/default) rust-ssh2+default-devel rust-ssh2+openssl-on-win32-devel: crate(ssh2/openssl-on-win32) rust-ssh2+openssl-on-win32-devel rust-ssh2+vendored-openssl-devel: crate(ssh2/vendored-openssl) rust-ssh2+vendored-openssl-devel Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2521510 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: Python, R, Haskell, SugarActivity, Perl, fonts, PHP, Java, C/C++, Ocaml Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2521510 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202521510%23c1 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
