Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819678 --- Comment #12 from Richard Shaw <[email protected]> 2012-05-09 20:05:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Ok, this looks pretty good so there's only two things I think we need at > > this > > point: > > > > 1. There doesn't seem to be any sort of license file distributed with the > > source, at least not one that's obvious like LICENSE or COPYING. > > > > http://www.cmake.org/cmake/project/license.html > > > > says the same thing as Copyright.txt in the source but there's no specific > > license referenced. > > > > I'm not sure I follow here - Copyright.txt is essentially the license file, as > it stipulates the license for the project, modulo the files with differing > licenses where it says: I guess I was confused since it doesn't come out and say "This is a BSD license" like GPL does. Licensecheck says Copyright.txt is BSD (3 Clause). OK, moving on :) > > 2. I'd like to wait until the maintainer comments on 820334 before we call > > it > > approved, although it can always be fixed later. The license field is set by > > good faith effort to be in compliance with the guidelines. > > OK I am happy to wait a bit for this, but I don't think this should be a > blocker in itself. I figure we give him a day or two and just run with it after that and fix it later if anything needs to be changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
