On 3/5/19 10:10 AM, Sanju Rakonde wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:29 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com > <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, > jenk...@build.gluster.org <mailto:jenk...@build.gluster.org> wrote: > >> SRC: > https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz > >> HASH: > > https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum > > > > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing. > > Please try them out and report test results on this list. > > > > # yum install centos-release-gluster > > # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server > > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4. > > The current RPMs should hence not be published. > > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])? > > > Shyam, I need some more time(approximately 1 day) to provide the fix. If > we have 1 more day with us, we can wait. Or else we can revert the > patch[1] and continue with the release.
We can wait a day, let me know tomorrow regarding the status. Thanks. > > > Thanks, > Shyam > > [1] Patch causing regression: > https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148 > > [2] Proposed fix on master: > https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/ > > > > -- > Thanks, > Sanju _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list packaging@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging