We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points to the correct commit?
On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: > Niels, Kaleb, > > We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows, > > commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5, > core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible > > commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4 > dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions > > As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on > announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to > respin 5.4. > > Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the > packaging. > > Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual. > > NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a > notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits > owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content. > > Thanks, > Shyam > > On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenk...@build.gluster.org > wrote: > >>> SRC: > https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz > >>> HASH: > https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum > >> > >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing. > >> Please try them out and report test results on this list. > >> > >> # yum install centos-release-gluster > >> # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server > > > > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert > > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4. > > > > The current RPMs should hence not be published. > > > > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or > > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])? > > > > Thanks, > > Shyam > > > > [1] Patch causing regression: > https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148 > > > > [2] Proposed fix on master: > https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/ > > _______________________________________________ > > maintainers mailing list > > maintain...@gluster.org > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintain...@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers >
_______________________________________________ packaging mailing list packaging@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging