Hi Prankur Gupta, > > So, I was thinking since apache have to be used to get the web-based > configuration, we can use > the mod_perl which is an optional module in apache itself. It will embed > the perl interpreter in it so > it will become easy to output the perl scripts and with proper > modification of these two files and > using HTML, we can transform the configuration wizard to be done using > web rather than command-line. > > Well this is a very rough sketch and I need guidance for proper > direction that I am going the right > way. Therefore, a kind feedback and help on this project to develop me a > good proposal is highly > appreciated.
We already use apache/mod_perl for our captive portal[1] and we would like our portal to be more independent of the administration and initial wizard so we were thinking more in the line of running in starman[2] or any other leaner and perl-friendly web servers. As discussed in another thread related to the Web Admin revamp, we are probably thinking something along the lines of Bootstrap[3] + Catalyst[4] as the starting point. The Web wizard would use that too. [1]: https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/stable/conf/httpd.conf.apache22 [2]: https://metacpan.org/module/Starman [3]: http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/ [4]: http://www.catalystframework.org/ -- Olivier Bilodeau obilod...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *115 :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Packetfence-devel mailing list Packetfence-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-devel
