Ah sorry, I am using VMWare Workstation 7 with Windows 7 on my host PC.
Should that not pose a problem either? Thank you so much!


> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on server (Stephanie Arce)
>   2. Problem reaching the web interface for PF ZEN (Ian Stewart)
>   3. Re: Problem reaching the web interface for PF ZEN (Mark Holmes)
>   4. Re: PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on server (Mark Holmes)
>   5. Re: PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on server
>      (Francois Gaudreault)
>   6. Packetfence v3.2 and Cisco 6500 port-security     problem - VLAN
>      ACCESS (Thomas Tsai)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:45:51 -0400
> From: Stephanie Arce <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on
>        server
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>        <CAAmN22Be+ntr03vOqixDAvpehFKnMgvocTK8E+AtLZYn6HL0=a...@mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello, I am currently trying to set up PacketFence with VLAN registration
> for testing in VMWare. My host PC only has 1 NIC, but in VMWare I have 4
> NICs set up. I have multiple physical PCs I can use as clients, and a Cisco
> Catalyst 2960 switch. Earlier today I connected my PF/host PC to the switch
> but got confused when setting up port security on the interfaces - I think
> I would have to make the interface from the switch to PF a trunk, and then
> my interfaces from the switch to clients access with all the port security
> settings configured. Does that sound like it should work?
>
> I had this set up earlier and I was not receiving any packets on my client,
> but then again I didn't have a DHCP helper-address on the switch so maybe
> that's what was wrong. I am trying to follow the "Configuration by Example"
> section in the administration guide on page 36.
>
> Thank you for any help!
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:31:32 +0000
> From: Mark Holmes <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1
>        NIC on server
> To: "[email protected]"
>        <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> That sounds right to me - you'll need to configure VLAN's on the card in
> the VMWare box and create your registration, isolation etc networks on
> there, connecting each one to a virtual NIC on the PF box.
>
> Mark
>
> Sent on the move
>
> On 13 Mar 2012, at 23:55, "Stephanie Arce" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello, I am currently trying to set up PacketFence with VLAN
> registration for testing in VMWare. My host PC only has 1 NIC, but in
> VMWare I have 4 NICs set up. I have multiple physical PCs I can use as
> clients, and a Cisco Catalyst 2960 switch. Earlier today I connected my
> PF/host PC to the switch but got confused when setting up port security on
> the interfaces - I think I would have to make the interface from the switch
> to PF a trunk, and then my interfaces from the switch to clients access
> with all the port security settings configured. Does that sound like it
> should work?
> >
> > I had this set up earlier and I was not receiving any packets on my
> client, but then again I didn't have a DHCP helper-address on the switch so
> maybe that's what was wrong. I am trying to follow the "Configuration by
> Example" section in the administration guide on page 36.
> >
> > Thank you for any help!
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
> > _______________________________________________
> > Packetfence-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
> Nuffield College is a Registered Charity No. 1137506. Registered Office:
> Nuffield College, New Road, Oxford, OX1 1NF
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:32:07 -0400
> From: Francois Gaudreault <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1
>        NIC on server
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> I assume you are using VMWare Player on Linux.  You will need to do a
> trunk port on your switch with the management as the native VLAN.  Then,
> in the VM itself, everything should be there.
>
> You don't need to configure VLAN interface on the host PC itself anymore
> since Player deals better with the VLAN tags.
>
> On 12-03-14 4:31 AM, Mark Holmes wrote:
> > That sounds right to me - you'll need to configure VLAN's on the card in
> the VMWare box and create your registration, isolation etc networks on
> there, connecting each one to a virtual NIC on the PF box.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > Sent on the move
> >
> > On 13 Mar 2012, at 23:55, "Stephanie Arce"<[email protected]>
>  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, I am currently trying to set up PacketFence with VLAN
> registration for testing in VMWare. My host PC only has 1 NIC, but in
> VMWare I have 4 NICs set up. I have multiple physical PCs I can use as
> clients, and a Cisco Catalyst 2960 switch. Earlier today I connected my
> PF/host PC to the switch but got confused when setting up port security on
> the interfaces - I think I would have to make the interface from the switch
> to PF a trunk, and then my interfaces from the switch to clients access
> with all the port security settings configured. Does that sound like it
> should work?
> >>
> >> I had this set up earlier and I was not receiving any packets on my
> client, but then again I didn't have a DHCP helper-address on the switch so
> maybe that's what was wrong. I am trying to follow the "Configuration by
> Example" section in the administration guide on page 36.
> >>
> >> Thank you for any help!
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Packetfence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to