Hi, I never really tested it, but so far I only saw it working on Linux. It's also clearly stated in the documentation/download page.
Thanks. On 12-03-14 9:08 AM, Stephanie Arce wrote: > Ah sorry, I am using VMWare Workstation 7 with Windows 7 on my host PC. > Should that not pose a problem either? Thank you so much! > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on server (Stephanie Arce) > 2. Problem reaching the web interface for PF ZEN (Ian Stewart) > 3. Re: Problem reaching the web interface for PF ZEN (Mark Holmes) > 4. Re: PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on server (Mark Holmes) > 5. Re: PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on server > (Francois Gaudreault) > 6. Packetfence v3.2 and Cisco 6500 port-security problem - VLAN > ACCESS (Thomas Tsai) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:45:51 -0400 > From: Stephanie Arce <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1 NIC on > server > To: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <CAAmN22Be+ntr03vOqixDAvpehFKnMgvocTK8E+AtLZYn6HL0=a...@mail.gmail.com > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hello, I am currently trying to set up PacketFence with VLAN > registration > for testing in VMWare. My host PC only has 1 NIC, but in VMWare I have 4 > NICs set up. I have multiple physical PCs I can use as clients, and > a Cisco > Catalyst 2960 switch. Earlier today I connected my PF/host PC to the > switch > but got confused when setting up port security on the interfaces - I > think > I would have to make the interface from the switch to PF a trunk, > and then > my interfaces from the switch to clients access with all the port > security > settings configured. Does that sound like it should work? > > I had this set up earlier and I was not receiving any packets on my > client, > but then again I didn't have a DHCP helper-address on the switch so > maybe > that's what was wrong. I am trying to follow the "Configuration by > Example" > section in the administration guide on page 36. > > Thank you for any help! > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:31:32 +0000 > From: Mark Holmes <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1 > NIC on server > To: "[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Message-ID: <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > That sounds right to me - you'll need to configure VLAN's on the > card in the VMWare box and create your registration, isolation etc > networks on there, connecting each one to a virtual NIC on the PF box. > > Mark > > Sent on the move > > On 13 Mar 2012, at 23:55, "Stephanie Arce" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Hello, I am currently trying to set up PacketFence with VLAN > registration for testing in VMWare. My host PC only has 1 NIC, but > in VMWare I have 4 NICs set up. I have multiple physical PCs I can > use as clients, and a Cisco Catalyst 2960 switch. Earlier today I > connected my PF/host PC to the switch but got confused when setting > up port security on the interfaces - I think I would have to make > the interface from the switch to PF a trunk, and then my interfaces > from the switch to clients access with all the port security > settings configured. Does that sound like it should work? > > > > I had this set up earlier and I was not receiving any packets on > my client, but then again I didn't have a DHCP helper-address on the > switch so maybe that's what was wrong. I am trying to follow the > "Configuration by Example" section in the administration guide on > page 36. > > > > Thank you for any help! > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! > > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft > developers > > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, > CSS3, MVC3, > > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d > > _______________________________________________ > > Packetfence-users mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > > Nuffield College is a Registered Charity No. 1137506. Registered > Office: Nuffield College, New Road, Oxford, OX1 1NF > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:32:07 -0400 > From: Francois Gaudreault <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] PF in a virtual environment/only 1 > NIC on server > To: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi, > > I assume you are using VMWare Player on Linux. You will need to do a > trunk port on your switch with the management as the native VLAN. Then, > in the VM itself, everything should be there. > > You don't need to configure VLAN interface on the host PC itself anymore > since Player deals better with the VLAN tags. > > On 12-03-14 4:31 AM, Mark Holmes wrote: > > That sounds right to me - you'll need to configure VLAN's on the > card in the VMWare box and create your registration, isolation etc > networks on there, connecting each one to a virtual NIC on the PF box. > > > > Mark > > > > Sent on the move > > > > On 13 Mar 2012, at 23:55, "Stephanie > Arce"<[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >> Hello, I am currently trying to set up PacketFence with VLAN > registration for testing in VMWare. My host PC only has 1 NIC, but > in VMWare I have 4 NICs set up. I have multiple physical PCs I can > use as clients, and a Cisco Catalyst 2960 switch. Earlier today I > connected my PF/host PC to the switch but got confused when setting > up port security on the interfaces - I think I would have to make > the interface from the switch to PF a trunk, and then my interfaces > from the switch to clients access with all the port security > settings configured. Does that sound like it should work? > >> > >> I had this set up earlier and I was not receiving any packets on > my client, but then again I didn't have a DHCP helper-address on the > switch so maybe that's what was wrong. I am trying to follow the > "Configuration by Example" section in the administration guide on > page 36. > >> > >> Thank you for any help! > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization& Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Packetfence-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users -- Francois Gaudreault, ing. jr [email protected] :: +1.514.447.4918 (x130) :: www.inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Packetfence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
