Derek Wuelfrath wrote: > There is actually a "known issue" since the role changing does not necessary > implicate a VLAN change and the "reevaluation" is based on the VLAN so if > there's no VLAN change, there's no reevaluation… > > We are aware of that and it is on the roadmap.
Excellent. For now I'll note it as an issue and just handle it via a status change. Thanks! > Cheers! > dw. -- --------------------------- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [email protected] --------------------------- "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.\" - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
