Thomas Tsai wrote: > Jason, > > Thanks for the obvious comment as this was not so obvious to me -- :-D > > I checked and you were right, somehow the switch allowed for the 802.1x mab > on a router port. (wow)
You'll find that Cisco allows a large number of odd combinations when it comes to supported/unsupported configurations. Some of the better ones are commands that it will accept, and show in the configuration, but that actually have no effect because they're not supported on that hardware. > Anyhow, it seems to work! Excited.... not sure why this isn't a supported > config in the documentation... Probably because either no one tried it, or no one confirmed it worked. So if you're confirming it, and you're willing to put together a blurb on what, if anything, is different from other configurations, I'm sure the Inverse crew would be happy to add it to the config guide. -- --------------------------- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [email protected] --------------------------- "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.\" - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
