Thomas Tsai wrote: > I’m trying to set up some excluded ports on my switch explicitly within > the PF admin interface while I test some settings with 802.1x > authentication – however, it does not work correctly regardless if I use > the IfIndex value from the switch, or the port # listed in the > packetfence.log. > > It’s almost as if PF is ignoring this – so I guess my question is, does > anyone know if packetfence attempts to use the uplink field at all while > configured for 802.1x auth via snmpv3/radius, or if this is not used at > all?
I think if you have dynamic uplinks checked, it ignores the uplinks field. > In either case, I would think packetfence would leave all my ports > alone that have not been configured for 802.1x … can someone kindly > confirm or deny this? J Packetfence will ignore all ports unless a request comes in from that port. -- --------------------------- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [email protected] --------------------------- "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.\" - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
