Fabrice DURAND <fdurand@...> writes:

> 
> 
>     Hello,
>       so here the secret of the HA.
>       In pf.conf on the management interface it should be something like
>       that:
>       [interface eth0]
>       ip=192.168.0.1
>       type=management,high-availability
>       mask=255.255.255.0
>       vip=192.168.0.3
>       Regards
>       Fabrice
>       Le 2014-01-03 03:34, Nicola Canepa a écrit :
> 

Thank you for the secret. I will give this a try.

I currently have DRBD running on one node with packetfence up and running on 
4.1.0. 

I already installed corosync and pacemaker and i took an image of the 
computer so I can roll back.

I was going to reimage my other computer using the image from the first
computer and update the IP's so they don't conflict.

>     Could it be a firewall issue?
>       Maybe the PF rules interfere with the cluster.
>       
>       Maybe adding the required ACLs to
>         /usr/local/pf/etc/iptables.conf may do the trick.
>       
I muck about with iptables and since i didn't know well how to make it
work with the labeled action fields, I put then into INPUT. This seemed
to help. So once i get it working, i will try to muck about with iptables
some more to secure things properly. 

>       I would allow all the traffic between the cluster IPs, plus
>         the broadcast addresses (224.0.0.0/4 I think).
I did forget about the broadcast addrs. Thanks.
>       
>       Nicola
>       

> 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to