Louis Munro wrote: > I couldn't agree more with Jason. > > PacketFence is meant to automate access control to switches where it > would be impractical to do it manually. > Server switches should be manually managed and access to them should be > limited.
There's a neat race condition you end up with if Packetfence is managing the switch the Packetfence server is connected to. :) > Regards, > -- > Louis Munro -- --------------------------- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [email protected] --------------------------- "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.\" - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
