That is why you always need at least two PacketFence installations.
Each managing the other's switch ;-)
--
Louis Munro
[email protected] :: www.inverse.ca
+1.514.447.4918 *125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
On 2014-02-18, at 15:20 , Jason Frisvold <[email protected]> wrote:
> Louis Munro wrote:
>> I couldn't agree more with Jason.
>>
>> PacketFence is meant to automate access control to switches where it
>> would be impractical to do it manually.
>> Server switches should be manually managed and access to them should be
>> limited.
>
> There's a neat race condition you end up with if Packetfence is managing
> the switch the Packetfence server is connected to. :)
>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Louis Munro
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------
> Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
> [email protected]
> ---------------------------
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.\"
> - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
> Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
> Read the Whitepaper.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
