Did you enable 802.1x auto register?

Also some info about the WLC platform with PF:

SNMP with WLCs is borked after version 7.0 (I think), we switched over to using 
RADIUS-COA and it worked much better for client de-auth.

Also, currently there is a "feature" in the WLCs that caches the user's session 
for 72 hours and will allow a user to re-establish that session without 
honoring the new RADIUS attributes that the WLC gets from PF.  TAC has gone on 
record telling me that this is a hard coded feature and cannot be changed.

I am working with my Cisco rep to see what we can do but for now we are forced 
to manually kick users off through the GUI on the WLC and that seems to close 
the session so when the user re-associates they are correctly assigned the new 
vlan.  It is really only a huge problem when the user registers though the 
captive portal.

I don't know if this is the same problem you are having, but you can test by 
taking an unregistered host and doing the following:

Associate to the AP on the WLC
Go through the registration process
Wait for the user to reconnect after getting kicked

Check their vlan in the WLC, it is most likely still the registration vlan even 
though PF sent the correct vlan ID to the WLC which you can verify in the logs 
on PF.

Jake Sallee
Godfather of Bandwidth
System Engineer
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
WWW.UMHB.EDU

900 College St.
Belton, Texas
76513

Fone: 254-295-4658
Phax: 254-295-4221
________________________________
From: Tim Tyndall [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 11:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PacketFence-users] VLAN registration

Hello,
I'm a newbie to PacketFence and I'm setting up a test environment with a single 
Cisco 2960 switch and a test WLAN on a Cisco 2504 WLC.  I'm working on the 
wired 802.1x authentication.  The 8021.1x authentication is working, but I'm 
not getting the correct VLAN assignment based on the rule I created.  I've got 
PacketFence set to query our AD servers and test reveals that is working.  I've 
defined a default vlan and and engineering vlan on the switch configuration.  
The port gets authenticated but is getting put in the registration vlan.  I 
look under nodes and my test computer shows up and under 802.1x it has my AD 
username.  If I select register and then assign it to either default or 
engineering for role then Packetfence will send the snmp trap to the switch to 
modify the VLAN but I'm not getting that same behavior based on the rule I've 
created under Configuration\Sources\Rule.  For now I just have a rule with 
connection type Ethernet-EAP and place in the default vlan.  Is there so
 mething I'm missing here?

Tim Tyndall


This e-mail, including attachments, contains confidential and/or proprietary 
information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is 
addressed. The reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution 
or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this 
e-mail immediately.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to