Interesting!

The entries did not have a radius secret, I erroneously thought that if you 
omit the field it would pull the value from the default switch like it does in 
the GUI.  It did not.

Once I added the secret they did indeed populate correctly.  Thank you James!  
Inverse to the rescue once again.

Jake Sallee
Godfather of Bandwidth
System Engineer
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
WWW.UMHB.EDU

900 College St.
Belton, Texas
76513

Fone: 254-295-4658
Phax: 254-295-4221

________________________________________
From: James Rouzier [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 10:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Switch in switchs.conf but not in radius_nas 
table

Jake can you verify if those new switches have the radiusSecret set.
If they do not they will not be added to the radius_nas table.

James Rouzier
[email protected] :: +1.514.755.3630  ::  http://www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://www.packetfence.org)

On 2014-09-15 11:49 AM, Sallee, Jake wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> Interesting problem, I added several switches to my switches.conf manually 
> since it is MUCH quicker than adding them individually in the GUI.  However 
> they are not showing up in the radius_nas table which is causing FreeRADIUS 
> not to respond to the auth requests.
>
> I have restarted the PF services and done a pfcmd configreload and even 
> configrelaod hard ... no joy :(
>
> pfcmd checkup returns normal.
>
> I will continue to work on this but any advice you can offer is greatly 
> appreciated.
>
> Jake Sallee
> Godfather of Bandwidth
> System Engineer
> University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
> WWW.UMHB.EDU
>
> 900 College St.
> Belton, Texas
> 76513
>
> Fone: 254-295-4658
> Phax: 254-295-4221
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to