Jake it will use values from the default switch.
However if you have an empty parameter like this

[a.b.c.d]
...
radisSecret=

It will not use the value from the default switch since the switch has 
an entry for it.

In order for the switch inherit from the default switch remove the line 
entirely.


James Rouzier
[email protected] :: +1.514.755.3630  ::  http://www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://www.packetfence.org)

On 2014-09-15 12:28 PM, Sallee, Jake wrote:
> Interesting!
>
> The entries did not have a radius secret, I erroneously thought that if you 
> omit the field it would pull the value from the default switch like it does 
> in the GUI.  It did not.
>
> Once I added the secret they did indeed populate correctly.  Thank you James! 
>  Inverse to the rescue once again.
>
> Jake Sallee
> Godfather of Bandwidth
> System Engineer
> University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
> WWW.UMHB.EDU
>
> 900 College St.
> Belton, Texas
> 76513
>
> Fone: 254-295-4658
> Phax: 254-295-4221
>
> ________________________________________
> From: James Rouzier [[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 10:58 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Switch in switchs.conf but not in radius_nas 
> table
>
> Jake can you verify if those new switches have the radiusSecret set.
> If they do not they will not be added to the radius_nas table.
>
> James Rouzier
> [email protected] :: +1.514.755.3630  ::  http://www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://www.packetfence.org)
>
> On 2014-09-15 11:49 AM, Sallee, Jake wrote:
>> Hello all!
>>
>> Interesting problem, I added several switches to my switches.conf manually 
>> since it is MUCH quicker than adding them individually in the GUI.  However 
>> they are not showing up in the radius_nas table which is causing FreeRADIUS 
>> not to respond to the auth requests.
>>
>> I have restarted the PF services and done a pfcmd configreload and even 
>> configrelaod hard ... no joy :(
>>
>> pfcmd checkup returns normal.
>>
>> I will continue to work on this but any advice you can offer is greatly 
>> appreciated.
>>
>> Jake Sallee
>> Godfather of Bandwidth
>> System Engineer
>> University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
>> WWW.UMHB.EDU
>>
>> 900 College St.
>> Belton, Texas
>> 76513
>>
>> Fone: 254-295-4658
>> Phax: 254-295-4221
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Want excitement?
>> Manually upgrade your production database.
>> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
>> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to