Hello Fabrice,

I changed reg and iso interface back to 10.126.210.1, 10.126.220.1 but
still no luck.

As you comment could we call PF as a switch L2? Then after plug a device to
4500 i am not able ping to 10.126.210.1 even from 4500 can not ping
10.126.210.1 also.
Do i misconfiguration on vmware? But other vlan are still fine excluded
some new vlan for PF.
Here is the interface configured on 4500 to vmware:
*The first 4500:*



















*interface GigabitEthernet7/4 description ### To KFVNVM02_NIC1
### switchport access vlan 122 switchport mode access speed 1000 duplex
full!interface GigabitEthernet7/5 description ### To KFVNVM02_NIC3
### switchport access vlan 122 switchport mode access speed 1000 duplex
full!interface GigabitEthernet7/6 description ### To KFVNVM02_NIC4
### switchport trunk allowed vlan 122,126,127,210,220,230 switchport mode
trunk speed 1000 duplex full *

*The second 4500:( I has 2 switches 4500 and HSRP configured)*



















*interface GigabitEthernet7/4 description ### To KFVNVM02_NIC2
### switchport access vlan 122 switchport mode access speed 1000 duplex
full!interface GigabitEthernet7/5 description ### To KFVNVM02_NIC5
### switchport access vlan 122 switchport mode access speed 1000 duplex
full!interface GigabitEthernet7/6 description ### To KFVNVM02_NIC6
### switchport trunk allowed vlan 122,126,127,210,220,230 switchport mode
trunk speed 1000 duplex full*

Any help is appreciated,

Best regards,



On 30 March 2015 at 23:01, Durand fabrice <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Minh,
>
> Keep in mind that reg and isol vlan are layer 2 networks, so you don't
> have to assign an ip address for these 2 vlan on the cisco config
> (packetfence is the only one who manage what happen on these 2 networks).
>
> So the the ip address of the reg interface is 10.126.210.1 (ifconfig) not
> 10.126.210.5 so change that in pf.conf and networks.conf and restart
> packetfence (same thing for isol).
>
> Now plug a device in a port on the 4500 configured like that:
>
> switchport mode access
> switch port access vlan 210
>
> with a device with a static ip :
> 10.126.210.33
>
> and try to ping  10.126.210.1.
>
> If this doesn't work then fix the vmware/cisco config to make it work
> (trunk, allowed vlan...).
>
> Regards
> Fabrice
>
>
> Le 2015-03-30 03:06, Minh Trung a écrit :
>
> Hello Fabrice,
>
> I already check trunk port but still problem as previously posted.
>
> My PF as below:
>
> PC ---+ --> Switch_L2(2960- Cisco) ---trunk--> Switch_L3(4500) ---trunk--->
> PF(VMware- ESX)
>
> Here is the config interface that L2 connected on Core switch:
>
> i
>
>
>
>
> *nterface GigabitEthernet2/4 description ### Testing Network Security
> ### switchport trunk allowed vlan
> 110,123,124,127,128,135,210,220,230 switchport mode trunk*
> I has 2 core switches and configured HSRP so all Vlan will be take 3 ip
> addresses for HSRP eg:
> Vlan123: x.x.x.1, x.x.x.2, x.x.x..3 are assign for core switches, other
> Vlan will be same.
> So i changed 2 interface Vlan on PF as below:
> *networks.conf*
> [10.126.210.0]
> dns=10.126.210.5
> dhcp_start=10.126.210.10
> *gateway=10.126.210.5*
> domain-name=vlan-registration.global
> nat_enabled=disabled
> named=enabled
> dhcp_max_lease_time=30
> fake_mac_enabled=disabled
> dhcpd=enabled
> dhcp_end=10.126.210.246
> type=vlan-registration
> netmask=255.255.255.0
> dhcp_default_lease_time=30
>
> [10.126.220.0]
> dns=10.126.220.5
> dhcp_start=10.126.220.10
> *gateway=10.126.220.5*
> domain-name=vlan-isolation.global
> nat_enabled=disabled
> named=enabled
> dhcp_max_lease_time=30
> fake_mac_enabled=disabled
> dhcpd=enabled
> dhcp_end=10.126.220.246
> type=vlan-isolation
> netmask=255.255.255.0
> dhcp_default_lease_time=30
>
> But still no luck
>
> Do i misconfiguration of any parts?
>
> Any help is appreciated,
>
> Regards,
>
> On 28 March 2015 at 23:17, Durand fabrice <[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>   Hello Minh,
>
> has you probably notice there is no RX traffic on eth0.210 and eth0.220
> and eth0.230 so it's probably a switch configuration issue.
>
> Check on the switch port where packetfence's eth0 has been plugged that
> 'switch port mode trunk' (cisco syntax) has been configured and check in
> all uplink port that the vlan 210 and 220 are allowed.
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing 
> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored
> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for
> all
> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs
> to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to