On 5/7/15, 4:03 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >after running permanently into config problems with ubuntu, I would like >to know, what you guys run pf on. >Could it be, that centos is preferred?? Or at least, better tested (with >5...) ? It wasn't until just recently (V4.x???) that distributions other than CentOS were supported for PF. I would consider CentOS the path of least pain at this point. Personally, every time that I ever touch Debian or Ubuntu, it is an exercise in frustration. It seems like they are more suited to desktop applications, which probably explains why I am just as frustrated with them as Microsoft at times... -Arthur ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arthur Emerson III Email: [email protected] Network Administrator InterNIC: AE81 Mount Saint Mary College MaBell: (845) 561-0800 Ext. 3109 330 Powell Ave. Fax: (845) 562-6762 Newburgh, NY 12550 SneakerNet: Aquinas Hall Room 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
