On May 7, 2015, at 12:26 , Arthur Emerson <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Do you plan to use the new CentOS firewalld stuff, or fall back to the
> legacy iptables???
> 
> -Arthur

Hi Arthur,
I am not personally working on that (yet) so it might be better for others to 
chime in.

The way I see it, we’ll go with the following logic:

Does it work? (no need to bother otherwise)
Does it work across platforms? (we try to keep the code base identical across 
distros and version inasmuch as it does not break anything).
Will it keep working in the future?

My opinion is that if iptables still works well and there is no pressing need 
to change that, we should keep it around for the time being since we will still 
be supporting distros without firewalld.

Regards,
--
Louis Munro
[email protected]  ::  www.inverse.ca 
+1.514.447.4918 x125  :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to