Derek, yes it's a separate unit. FreeBSD 10.2 with Suricata running on it. No 
special suite of softwares. It's just the Suricata install.

-----Original Message-----
From: packetfence-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net 
[mailto:packetfence-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 10:53 AM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: PacketFence-users Digest, Vol 90, Issue 36

Send PacketFence-users mailing list submissions to
        packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        packetfence-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
        packetfence-users-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of PacketFence-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Suricata alerts to Packet Fence (Derek Wuelfrath)
   2. Re: pfdhcplistener (Derek Wuelfrath)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:41:05 -0400
From: Derek Wuelfrath <dwuelfr...@inverse.ca>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Suricata alerts to Packet Fence
To: ML PF <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <6c92c7d1-0d78-42df-be14-410dc28c8...@inverse.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hello Chris,

Are you running Suricata on a separate box (I assume). Are you running it 
standalone or withing a security suite (SecurityOnion per example).

Let me know

Cheers!
dw.

?
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110) 
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Boley, Chris <chrisbo...@cogentrix.com> wrote:
> 
> Does anyone happen to know where I can find info on sending suricata alert 
> events over to Packet Fence?
>  
>  
> Chris Boley | Network Engineer | Cogentrix Energy Power Management, 
> LLC
> 
>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
> <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:52:22 -0400
From: Derek Wuelfrath <dwuelfr...@inverse.ca>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
To: ML PF <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <79229123-87df-4f2f-83ab-3231b5525...@inverse.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hello Chinmay,

I?m looking at it and I?ll get back to you.

Cheers!
dw.

?
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110) 
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:17 AM, Chinmay Mahata <chinmay_mah...@rediffmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Dear Derek,
>     Any thought on my issue.....
> 
> Regards,
> --Chinmay
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Chinmay Mahata" <chinmay_mah...@rediffmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 18:13:36
> To: "packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net" 
> <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener Dear Derek,
>      Thanks for your quick response.   I think I could not describe my 
> problem/query properly.
> 
> DHCPD is running on only one interface (eth0) of my PF server, no issue with 
> that.
> 
> Actually at the WAN side (upstream) of my PF server there is another DHCP 
> server is running (though PF server WAN has static IP). Since pfdhcplistener 
> is running at eth1(WAN) also, in the node (web)page I can see many 
> unregistered nodes of WAN network which I don't want.
> 
>     I want to see only those nodes in the webpage which are under PF server 
> and who are getting IP addresses from DHCP server running in PF server (on 
> eth0). Hope pfdhcplistener on eth0 only can catch those. 
> 
> So I want to run only one instance of pfdhcplistener on interface eth0 
> (pfdhcplistener_eth0). Please let me know how can I do that.
> 
> Thanks again Derek.
> 
> Regards,
> --Chinmay
>     
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Derek Wuelfrath <dwuelfr...@inverse.ca>
> Sent: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 22:11:09
> To: ML PF <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener Chinmay,
> 
>> The packetfence server is working as a DHCP server.
>> I see that two pfdhcplisteners are running: pfdhcplistener_eth0, 
>> pfdhcplistener_eth1.
>> 
>> 
>> But I want to run only one pfdhcplistener viz. pfdhcplistener_eth0. Can it 
>> be possible (or it may cause other problem)? Which config item do I need to 
>> modify for that?
> 
> ?pfdhcplistener?, as its name says, listen for dhcp packets.
> PacketFence starts a ?pfdhcplistener? daemon on each of the required network 
> interfaces (in this case, management and inline).
> 
> ?pfdhcplistener? is not acting as a DHCP server, dhcpd is. ?pfdhcplistener? 
> is only listening to DHCP packet for MAC <-> IP association useful in 
> PacketFence.
> 
> If you do a
> ps uafx | grep dhcpd
> you should see the dhcpd daemon running with only eth0 as listening interface.
> 
> Cheers!
> dw.
> 
> ?
> Derek Wuelfrath
> dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.491 
> <x-msg://f5mail.rediff.com/cgi-bin/prored.cgi?red=http://1.514.447.491
> &isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0&rogue=ba42cf6a7cd18481ec5520d40f020
> 7840b977b09>8 (x110) :: +1.866.353.615 
> <x-msg://f5mail.rediff.com/cgi-bin/prored.cgi?red=http://1.866.353.615
> &isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0&rogue=af879f62ee1a7599566197d6e2221
> d8167f40afc>3 (x110) Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu 
> <http://www.sogo.nu/>) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org 
> <http://www.packetfence.org/>)
> 
>> On Oct 8, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Chinmay Mahata <chinmay_mah...@rediffmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, 
>>     I have setup packetfence(5.4.0) with inline enforcement having below 
>> interface details (LAN: eth0, WAN: eth1).
>> 
>> [interface eth0]
>> enforcement=inlinel2
>> type=internal
>> 
>> [interface eth1]
>> type=management
>> 
>> The packetfence server is working as a DHCP server.
>> I see that two pfdhcplisteners are running: pfdhcplistener_eth0, 
>> pfdhcplistener_eth1.
>> 
>> 
>> But I want to run only one pfdhcplistener viz. pfdhcplistener_eth0. Can it 
>> be possible (or it may cause other problem)? Which config item do I need to 
>> modify for that?
>> 
>> Waiting for your help.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance.
>> --Chinmay
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Get your own FREE website, FREE domain & FREE mobile app with Company email. 
>> ?
>>  
>> <https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.
>> com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>Know More > 
>> <http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com
>> ?sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___&cmp=host&lnk=sign-1-10-13&nsrv1=host>--------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> - _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users 
>> <x-msg://f5mail.rediff.com/cgi-bin/prored.cgi?red=https%3A%2F%2Flists
>> .sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Fpacketfence-users&isImage=0&Blo
>> ckImage=0&rediffng=0&rogue=fed20659922918f122f7abeaae6537fdd08a0e78>
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users 
> <x-msg://f5mail.rediff.com/cgi-bin/prored.cgi?red=https%3A%2F%2Flists.
> sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Fpacketfence-users&isImage=0&Block
> Image=0&rediffng=0&rogue=fed20659922918f122f7abeaae6537fdd08a0e78>
> 
> 
> Get your own FREE website, FREE domain & FREE mobile app with Company email. ?
>  
> <https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.c
> om/signatureline.htm@Middle?>Know More > 
> <http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com?
> sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___&cmp=host&lnk=sign-1-10-13&nsrv1=host> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> 
>  
> <https://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.c
> om/signatureline.htm@Middle?> Get your own FREE website, FREE domain & 
> FREE mobile app with Company email.
> Know More > 
> <http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://businessemail.rediff.com?
> sc_cid=sign-1-10-13___&cmp=host&lnk=sign-1-10-13&nsrv1=host>----------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


End of PacketFence-users Digest, Vol 90, Issue 36
*************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to