I upgraded from 5.4.0 to 5.5.2 .  There are a few things I had to correct after 
the upgrade.  Here is the list

Errors when trying to boot after upgrade
FATAL - unknown configuration parameter alerting.wins_server if you added the 
parameter yourself make sure it is present in conf/documentation.conf
FATAL - unknown configuration parameter alerting.admin_netbiosname if you added 
the parameter yourself make sure it is present in conf/documentation.conf
WARNING - invalid parameter billing_engine for profile default


In the Documenation.conf I had to add
[alerting.wins_server]
type=text
description=<<EOT
Wins Server
EOT

[alerting.admin_netbiosname]
type=text
description=<<EOT
Netbios Name
EOT

In the profiles.conf
I removed the billing_engine=disabled line

The radius server would not start because of this error in the radiusd.log file
Wed Dec 16 09:59:27 2015 : Error: Failed binding to authentication address 
172.18.2.90 port 1812 as server packetfence: Address already in use
Wed Dec 16 09:59:27 2015 : Error: /usr/local/pf/raddb//auth.conf[9]: Error 
binding to port for 172.18.2.90 port 1812
So I went into the radius.conf and commented out these portions
listen {
        type = auth
        ipaddr = %%management_ip%%
        port = 0
        virtual_server = packetfence
}

listen {
        ipaddr = %%management_ip%%
        port = 0
        type = acct
        virtual_server = packetfence
}

They appear to be starting twice once in this conf and once in the auth.conf


The big issue I have now that it is running again is that every node in the 
database about 20 times.  Is there an easy way to clean up the database.  I 
can't seem to connect to the DB from the outside and don't want to tackle it 
from the commandline if possible.


Thanks
Dan Nelson
Nutraceutical Corporation
801-334-3702

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to