I'm also seeing dhcpd high cpu usage, but at the same time I also 
noticed errors on my fingerbank setup. I thought this was the cause.

I have turned off OMAPI now as well, let's see how dhcpd behaves in a 
few hours from now.

MJ

On 02/10/2016 11:47 AM, Frederic Hermann wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> On our new pf 5.6.1 production server (using VLAN enforcement), we
> observed that dhcpd was running at 100% of available CPU after a few
> hours in production.
>
> After some investigations, it seems related to OMAPI setup : when we
> disable the OMAPI resolution for ip2mac and mac2ip, the problem does not
> appear again.
>
> We are not able to  find what precise operation triggers the issue, as
> we can not reproduce this on our test server, even when trying to stress
> the dhcp server.
>
> Did anyone here already notice the same ?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> --
>
> Frédéric Hermann
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to