Hello Fabrice,
Well noted.
First of all, must say a very big thank you for the great support :-)
I would say PF is really a powerful machine.
Just for my curiosity, one of my friend, he has a Forescout NAC in his
environment. He claimed that Forescout is reply on span port to monitor the
packets that was mirroring from the switches, it can inject ACL/virtual
firewall rules to the switches upon unknown devices detected.
can pf use Violation compliance to scan domain computers/users and assign
them to a production vlan dynamically without using port-based
auth/conventional way to protect the BYOD?
Regards,
Reeyon
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca> wrote:
> Hello Reeyon,
>
> really happy that it's working for you.
> In my opinion it's better to use the ssid because it's more specific than
> the connection_type (in the case of multiples ssid), but do as you want.
>
> Regards
> Fabrice
>
> Le 2016-02-11 21:30, Reeyon Lim a écrit :
>
> Hello Fabrice,
>
> It is perfect now :-)
> Just realized that supplicant's server CA was causing the problem.
>
> Btw, still stick with connection_type filter Wireless-802.11-EAP and it is
> working.
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Reeyon
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Fabrice DURAND <fdur...@inverse.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Reeyon,
>>
>> under wireless do you have machine and user auth ?
>>
>> Also it should work but you can change the connection_type filter by a
>> ssid filter.
>> Something like that:
>>
>> [ssidsecure]
>> filter = ssid
>> operator = is
>> value = ssidsecure
>>
>> Regards
>> Fabrice
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 2016-02-10 23:33, Reeyon Lim a écrit :
>> > Hello Fabrice,
>> >
>> > oh yeah .. it's working now with Ethernet LAN :-)
>> > I have logout & login and to see user/computer authentication logs
>> > flowing.
>> >
>> > how about wireless EAP? I tried with the following scripts but it
>> > seems doesn't work.
>> >
>> > [machine]
>> > filter = node_info
>> > attribute = machine_account
>> > operator = defined
>> > value = default
>> > #
>> > [ssidsecure]
>> > filter = connection_type
>> > operator = is
>> > value = Wireless-802.11-EAP
>> > #
>> > [4:ssidsecure&machineauth]
>> > scope = AutoRegister
>> > role = machines
>> > #
>> > [5:ssidsecure&machineauth]
>> > scope = NodeInfoForAutoReg
>> > role = machines
>> > #
>> > [6:ssidsecure&!machine]
>> > scope = RegisteredRole
>> > role = refuse
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Reeyon
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Reeyon Lim < <reeyon...@gmail.com>
>> reeyon...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:reeyon...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Fabrice,
>> >
>> > Thank you for the script, appreciate that :-)
>> >
>> > However, no matter how I try, the supplicant will always goes to
>> > user authentication first instead of computer authentication. In
>> > order to autoreg the computer, I did the following steps:
>> >
>> > 1. first my windows 7 take user authentication, although radius
>> > accepted, but pf present registration vlan
>> > 2. Then, manually force my win7 supplicant to "computer
>> > authentication" in 802.1x setting, and reconnect the port and pf
>> > starts to autoreg the machine
>> > 3. Lastly, revert back the 802.1x setting to "user or computer
>> > authentication", reconnect the port, pf autoreg without issue
>> >
>> > so if I unreg the node manually, I have to redo step 2 & 3 to
>> > autoreg the node.
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Reeyon
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Fabrice DURAND
>> > <fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Reeyon,
>> >
>> > you can do something like that:
>> >
>> > First create a role machine and a role refuse.
>> > In the switch config assign the role machine to a production
>> > vlan and
>> > refuse to the vlan id -1.
>> >
>> > Next add to the vlan filter this:
>> >
>> > [EthernetEAP]
>> > filter = connection_type
>> > operator = is
>> > value = Ethernet-EAP
>> >
>> > [machineauth]
>> > filter = user_name
>> > operator = regex
>> > value = ^host\/
>> >
>> > [machine]
>> > filter = node_info
>> > attribute = machine_account
>> > operator = defined
>> > value = default
>> >
>> > #### Machine Auth Autoregister ####
>> >
>> > [1:EthernetEAP&machineauth]
>> > scope = AutoRegister
>> > role = machine
>> >
>> > [2:EthernetEAP&machineauth]
>> > scope = NodeInfoForAutoReg
>> > role = machine
>> >
>> > #### Refuse User Auth without machine Auth ####
>> >
>> > [3:EthernetEAP&!machine]
>> > scope = RegisteredRole
>> > role = refuse
>> >
>> > So if the first authentication is machine then packetfence will
>> > autoregister it, next if the device do user auth then it will
>> > compute
>> > the role in the authentication source you defined (Portal
>> > profile with
>> > filter connection_type EthernetEAP and source AD User and AD
>> > Machine).
>> > If the device try to authenticate directly without previously
>> did
>> > machine auth then it will be refuse.
>> >
>> > Btw if you want to forward the device to the registration vlan
>> > instead
>> > of refusing it then replace the rule 3 with that:
>> >
>> > [3:EthernetEAP&!machine]
>> > scope = RegisteredRole
>> > role = registration
>> > action = deregister_node
>> > action_param = $mac
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Fabrice
>> >
>> > Le 2016-02-04 22:17, Reeyon Lim a écrit :
>> > > In addition, if any of the authorized user bring their
>> > personal device
>> > > such as mobile/IPAD/tablet/laptops, because since they
>> > already have
>> > > 802.1x AD account in the company, so that they can easily
>> setup
>> > > 802.1x settings themselves and access granted.
>> > >
>> > > Endpoint profiling/classification will have more flexibility
>> > and ease
>> > > configuration.
>> > > Something similar to this:
>> > > PF detects any BYOD that aren't authorized, put them into
>> > registration.
>> > >
>> > > I have no idea how to deal with this objective, by using
>> > traditional
>> > > 802.1x or WMI or Violation?
>> > >
>> > > I would prefer Violation, because it can operate dynamically
>> > by the
>> > > design i guess. for example: PF detect domain computers, put
>> > them
>> > > normal vlan, otherwise put them in Registration vlan.
>> > > So how can I achieve this goal?
>> > >
>> > > Thank you.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Reeyon
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Reeyon Lim
>> > <reeyon...@gmail.com <mailto:reeyon...@gmail.com>
>> > > <mailto:reeyon...@gmail.com <mailto:reeyon...@gmail.com>>>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello Fabrice,
>> > >
>> > > From the windows supplicant, by default "user and computer
>> > > authentication" was chosen in 802.1x settings.
>> > >
>> > > Does PF provides other better solution for 802.1x
>> > authentication
>> > > for BYOD?
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Reeyon
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Fabrice DURAND
>> > > <fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>
>> > <mailto: <fdur...@inverse.ca>fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:
>> fdur...@inverse.ca>>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > You talked about netbios name, not dns name.
>> > >
>> > > In PacketFence, freeradius validate the machine name
>> > > (host/FMCART310-15.domain.com
>> > <http://FMCART310-15.domain.com>
>> > > <http://FMCART310-15.domain.com>) and in PacketFence
>> > side we
>> > > have to create
>> > > another authentication source with the user attribute
>> > > servicePrincipalName.
>> > >
>> > > Check in your AD for a machine account
>> > (Adsiedit.msc) in the
>> > > attribute
>> > > servicePrincipalName and you will see the complete
>> > dns name of
>> > > the machine.
>> > >
>> > > So the only limit is 64 characteres of the dns name.
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > > Fabrice
>> > >
>> > > Le 2016-02-03 10:16, Tedder, Eric a écrit :
>> > > > Fabrice,
>> > > >
>> > > > I am not certain how you get it to work after 15
>> > characters,
>> > > but everything I read and have experienced with AD and
>> > > hostnames being longer than 14/15 characters is that
>> > they
>> > > don't authenticate because AD will truncate them.
>> > > >
>> > > > <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/909264>
>> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/909264
>> > > >
>> > https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731383.aspx
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12299256/ise-admin-server-16-character-hostname
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: Fabrice DURAND [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca
>> > <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>
>> > > <mailto: <fdur...@inverse.ca>fdur...@inverse.ca
>> <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>>]
>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 9:17 AM
>> > > > To: <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > > <mailto: <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>> > > > Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] machine
>> > authentication
>> > > >
>> > > > There is no limit of 14 characters, i have machine
>> > auth with
>> > > more than
>> > > > 30 characters and there is no issue.
>> > > >
>> > > > Also did you checked that the client do machine
>> auth ?
>> > > (windows supplicant)
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > > Fabrice
>> > > >
>> > > > Le 2016-02-03 08:52, Tedder, Eric a écrit :
>> > > >> The one limitation that I have found with computer
>> > > authentication with
>> > > >> packet fence and Active directory is that the
>> > computer name
>> > > cannot
>> > > >> exceed 14 characters or it breaks.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> *From:*Reeyon Lim [mailto:reeyon...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:reeyon...@gmail.com>
>> > > <mailto: <reeyon...@gmail.com>reeyon...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:reeyon...@gmail.com>>]
>> > > >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 02, 2016 9:39 PM
>> > > >> *To:* <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > > <mailto: <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto: <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>> > > >> *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] machine
>> authentication
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Hello Fabrice,
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Now i restarted the config from scratch.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 0. wipe out existing parameters in
>> vlan_filters.conf
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 1. Created AD-computer source, according to the
>> > > Administration Guide.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2. Map this source to 802.1x portal profile.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 3. run raddebug -f
>> > /usr/local/pf/var/run/radiusd.sock -t 3600
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 4. I can't see any "host/xxxxxx" in debug, but I
>> see
>> > > "domain\username"
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> So I guess the computer is authenticating user
>> > credentials
>> > > instead of
>> > > >> machine auth.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Anything that I've missed out?
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Regards,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Reeyon
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Fabrice DURAND
>> > > <fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>
>> > <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>>
>> > > >> <mailto: <fdur...@inverse.ca>fdur...@inverse.ca
>> > <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca
>> > <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Hello Reeyon,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Le 2016-02-02 02:12, Reeyon Lim a écrit :
>> > > >>> Hello Everyone,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Sorry for my multiples questions recently.
>> > > >> No problem , the mailling list is for that.
>> > > >>> I have been setting up a 802.1x authentication
>> > for the
>> > > lab, but i
>> > > >>> need to do more secure of 802.1x authentication
>> > where I found
>> > > >>> machine authentication in the Administration
>> guide.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Tried to follow every steps in the guide, but
>> > failed to
>> > > make it work.
>> > > >>> I do not find any logs in packetfence.log like
>> > > "host/xxxxxx", and pf
>> > > >>> just push the domain PC to RegistrationRole
>> without
>> > > authentication.
>> > > >> Check first in the radius.log or run radius in
>> > debug mode
>> > > to see why
>> > > >> machine auth failed (raddebug -f
>> > > /usr/local/pf/var/run/radiusd.sock -t
>> > > >> 3000).
>> > > >> When you will be able to successfully
>> > authenticate machine in
>> > > >> freeradius then you will be able to see in
>> > packetfence.log
>> > > username
>> > > >> like host/xxxxxx
>> > > >>> I have 2 source lists: ad-user, and ad-computers
>> > These two
>> > > lists
>> > > >>> mapped to 802.1x portal profile.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> The objective here is to block any non-domain of
>> > BYOD to
>> > > be able to
>> > > >>> access the network, except domain machines and
>> > users.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >> Next you will have to deal with vlan filter to
>> > test if
>> > > machine auth
>> > > >> passed before user auth.
>> > > >>> Please help!
>> > > >>> Thank you.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Regards,
>> > > >>> Reeyon
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >> Regards
>> > > >> Fabrice
>> > > >>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> --------
>> > > >>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into
>> > Application
>> > > >>> Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App
>> > > instances at just
>> > > >>> $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions
>> > and take
>> > > corrective
>> > > >>> actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve
>> end-user
>> > > experience. Signup Now!
>> > > >>>
>> > >
>> >
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> _______________________________________________
>> > > >>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> > > >>> <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > > <mailto: <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>> > > >> <mailto: <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > > <mailto: <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>>
>> > > >>>
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> Fabrice Durand
>> > > >> <fdur...@inverse.ca>fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:
>> fdur...@inverse.ca>
>> > <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>>
>> > > <mailto: <fdur...@inverse.ca>fdur...@inverse.ca
>> > <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca
>> > <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>>> ::
>> > > +1.514.447.4918 <tel:%2B1.514.447.4918>
>> <tel:%2B1.514.447.4918>
>> > > >> <tel:%2B1.514.447.4918> (x135) ::
>> <http://www.inverse.ca>www.inverse.ca
>> > <http://www.inverse.ca>
>> > > <http://www.inverse.ca>
>> > > >> < <http://www.inverse.ca>http://www.inverse.ca>
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders
>> > behind SOGo
>> > > >> ( <http://www.sogo.nu>http://www.sogo.nu) and
>> PacketFence
>> > (http://packetfence.org)
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> --------
>> > > >> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into
>> > Application
>> > > Performance
>> > > >> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances
>> > at just
>> > > $35/Month
>> > > >> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take
>> > corrective
>> > > actions now
>> > > >> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user
>> > experience. Signup
>> > > Now!
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
>> > > >> _______________________________________________
>> > > >> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> > > >> <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > > <mailto: <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>> > > >> <mailto: <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > > <mailto: <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>>
>> > > >>
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> --------
>> > > >> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into
>> > Application
>> > > Performance
>> > > >> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances
>> > at just
>> > > $35/Month
>> > > >> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take
>> > corrective
>> > > actions now
>> > > >> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user
>> > experience. Signup
>> > > Now!
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> _______________________________________________
>> > > >> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> > > >> <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > > <mailto: <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>> > > >>
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Fabrice Durand
>> > > > <fdur...@inverse.ca>fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:
>> fdur...@inverse.ca>
>> > <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>> ::
>> > > +1.514.447.4918 <tel:%2B1.514.447.4918>
>> > <tel:%2B1.514.447.4918> (x135) ::
>> > > www.inverse.ca < <http://www.inverse.ca>
>> http://www.inverse.ca>
>> > <http://www.inverse.ca> Inverse inc. :: Leaders
>> > > behind SOGo ( <http://www.sogo.nu>http://www.sogo.nu)
>> and PacketFence
>> > > (http://packetfence.org)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into
>> > Application
>> > > Performance
>> > > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at
>> > just
>> > > $35/Month
>> > > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take
>> > corrective
>> > > actions now
>> > > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user
>> > experience. Signup Now!
>> > > >
>> >
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > PacketFence-users mailing list
>> > > > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>> > > >
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Fabrice Durand
>> > > fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>
>> > <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>> ::
>> > > +1.514.447.4918 <tel:%2B1.514.447.4918>
>> > <tel:%2B1.514.447.4918> (x135) ::
>> > > www.inverse.ca < <http://www.inverse.ca>
>> http://www.inverse.ca>
>> > <http://www.inverse.ca>
>> > > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo
>> > (http://www.sogo.nu) and
>> > > PacketFence ( <http://packetfence.org>
>> http://packetfence.org)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into
>> > Application
>> > > Performance
>> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at
>> > just $35/Month
>> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take
>> corrective
>> > > actions now
>> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience.
>> > Signup Now!
>> > >
>> >
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > PacketFence-users mailing list
>> > > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
>> > >
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
>> > Performance
>> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just
>> > $35/Month
>> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective
>> > actions now
>> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup
>> Now!
>> > >
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > PacketFence-users mailing list
>> > > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto: <PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > >
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Fabrice Durand
>> > fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> ::
>> > +1.514.447.4918 <tel:%2B1.514.447.4918> (x135) ::
>> > www.inverse.ca < <http://www.inverse.ca>http://www.inverse.ca>
>> > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo ( <http://www.sogo.nu>
>> http://www.sogo.nu) and
>> > PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application
>> > Performance
>> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just
>> $35/Month
>> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective
>> > actions now
>> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
>> >
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > PacketFence-users mailing list
>> > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > <mailto:PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
>> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
>> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
>> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
>> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > PacketFence-users mailing list
>> > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabrice Durand
>> fdur...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x135) :: www.inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo ( <http://www.sogo.nu>
>> http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
>> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
>> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
>> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup
> Now!http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing
> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
